BetaHCF Case Studies Library is in beta. We're still adding campaigns and fixing things.
HCF Case Studies Library

← All campaigns · Open in the library

Canadian graphic cigarette health warnings

Also: Tobacco Products Information Regulations · Canadian pictorial warning labels

In 2000 Canada became the first country to require picture warnings on cigarette packs: 16 rotating images and messages covering 50% of the front and back. A 2011 update raised coverage to 75% and added a quitline number; plain packaging followed in 2020 and warnings printed on individual cigarettes from 2023.

Years
2000–now
Country
Canada
Topic
Tobacco
Asks people to
Never startStop
Strategy
Cessation service linkFear appealPolicy paired
Channel
Packaging
Audience
General public

Evidence

Quasi-experimentalPositive

Hammond et al. (2003): 91% of 616 Ontario smokers had read the new labels; those who read, thought about and discussed them were more likely to have quit, tried to quit or cut down three months later (OR 1.07 per unit of cognitive processing, adjusted for baseline intentions). Azagba & Sharaf (2013), National Population Health Survey 1998-2008 with a phase-in exposure variable: warnings lowered the odds of smoking (OR 0.875, 95% CI 0.821-0.932) and raised the odds of a quit attempt (OR 1.33, 1.19-1.49). Borland et al. (2009, ITC four-country) compares Canada's graphic warnings with text warnings elsewhere. No randomized comparison; effects are associated with a national policy change.

Sponsor (who paid)

  • Health Canada Foreign government, regulator and creator

Credits (who made it)

Not recorded yet.

Sources

  1. Hammond D et al. Impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behaviour. Tob Control 2003;12(4):391-5 evaluation · 2003 · DOI 10.1136/tc.12.4.391 · PMID 14660774
  2. Hammond D et al. Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: evidence from Canadian smokers. Am J Public Health 2004;94(8):1442-5 evaluation · 2004 · DOI 10.2105/ajph.94.8.1442 · PMID 15284057
  3. Hammond D et al. The impact of cigarette warning labels and smoke-free bylaws on smoking cessation: evidence from former smokers. Can J Public Health 2004 evaluation · 2004 · DOI 10.1007/BF03403649 · PMID 15191132
  4. Azagba S, Sharaf MF. The effect of graphic cigarette warning labels on smoking behavior: evidence from the Canadian experience. Nicotine Tob Res 2013;15(3):708-17 evaluation · 2012 · DOI 10.1093/ntr/nts194 · PMID 22990228
  5. Borland R et al. Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: findings from four countries over five years. Tob Control 2009 evaluation · 2009 · DOI 10.1136/tc.2008.028043 · PMID 19561362
  6. Tobacco packaging warning messages (Wikipedia) reference
  7. Baskerville NB et al. Impact of Canadian tobacco packaging policy on use of a toll-free quit-smoking line: an interrupted time-series analysis. CMAJ Open 2016 evaluation · 2016 · DOI 10.9778/cmajo.20150104 · PMID 27280115

Research notes

Regulation rather than a paid campaign, included because packaging is a channel in the taxonomy and the evidence is strong. No creative agency credit found; Health Canada developed the images (the design/testing contractors were not checked). Wikipedia gives both 2000 (regulations) and 2001 (first packs) as the start; startYear uses the regulation year. Papers' details from PubMed metadata. Evaluation sources added 2026-10-22 (citation snowballing / helpline pass): Baskerville 2016; evidence level and outcome unchanged. Baskerville 2016 evaluates the 2012 warnings that added the quitline number (later phase).

Record cases/canada-graphic-cigarette-warnings.json, updated 2026-10-22· Link to this campaign