Be Clear on Cancer
Also: BCoC
Public Health England and Department of Health campaigns (regional from 2010, national from 2011) that told people the early signs of specific cancers, such as blood in pee or a cough lasting three weeks, and to see their GP.
- Years
- 2010–now
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Topic
- Cancer screening
- Asks people to
- RecognizeSeek help
- Strategy
- Simple instruction
- Channel
- OutdoorPrintRadioTV
- Audience
- AdultsOlder adultsAdults over 50 in England.
Evidence
ObservationalMixed
Synthesis of 11 national campaigns 2012-2016 (Lai 2021): GP visits for the target symptoms rose for 9 of 10 campaigns and urgent cancer referrals for 9 of 11. More cancers were diagnosed than expected for 8 of 10, with more early-stage diagnoses for 4 of 10. No effect on survival.
Sponsor (who paid)
- Public Health England / Department of Health Foreign government, funder and creator
Credits (who made it)
Not recorded yet.
Sources
- Lai J et al. Reviewing the impact of 11 national Be Clear on Cancer public awareness campaigns, England, 2012 to 2016: A synthesis of published evaluation results. Int J Cancer 2021;148(5):1172-1182 evaluation · 2021 · DOI 10.1002/ijc.33277 · PMID 32875560
- Power E et al. Change in public awareness of symptoms and perceived barriers to seeing a doctor following Be Clear on Cancer campaigns in England. Br J Cancer 2015;112 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S22-6 evaluation · 2015 · DOI 10.1038/bjc.2015.32 · PMID 25734386
- Merriel SWD et al. A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer 'Blood in Pee' campaign in England. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022;31(5):e13606 evaluation · 2022 · DOI 10.1111/ecc.13606 · PMID 35570375
- Torrance N et al. Abdominal cancer symptoms: Evaluation of the impact of a regional public awareness campaign. Eur J Cancer Care 2021 evaluation · 2021 · DOI 10.1111/ecc.13500 · PMID 34382254
- Eberhardt J et al. Impact of the third national 'Be Clear on Cancer' Breast Cancer in Women over 70 Campaign on general practitioner attendance and referral, diagnosis rates and prevalence awareness. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022 evaluation · 2022 · DOI 10.1111/ecc.13583 · PMID 35384107
- Hughes-Hallett A et al. Assessing the impact of mass media public health campaigns. Be Clear on Cancer 'blood in pee': a case in point. BJU Int 2016 evaluation · 2016 · DOI 10.1111/bju.13205 · PMID 26072663
- Siau K et al. The 2015 upper gastrointestinal 'Be Clear on Cancer' campaign: its impact on gastroenterology services and malignant and premalignant diagnoses. Frontline Gastroenterol 2017 evaluation · 2017 · DOI 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100820 · PMID 29067155
- Peacock O et al. 'Be Clear on Cancer': the impact of the UK National Bowel Cancer Awareness Campaign. Colorectal Dis 2013 evaluation · 2013 · DOI 10.1111/codi.12220 · PMID 23656572
- Bethune R et al. Did the 'Be Clear on Bowel Cancer' public awareness campaign pilot result in a higher rate of cancer detection?. Postgrad Med J 2013 evaluation · 2013 · DOI 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131014 · PMID 23572594
Research notes
Created 2026-10-22 by literature mining (PubMed/OpenAlex); evidence level, outcome and findings are paraphrased from the evaluation abstracts, full texts not read. No credits: no page naming an agency was checked. Start years from the synthesis abstract (run since 2010). Torrance 2021 added 2026-10-22 (openalex-deep queue; DOI checked on Crossref and PMID via NCBI esummary 2026-10-22; abstract confirms it is a PHE Be Clear on Cancer regional abdominal campaign in England): recognition 35% vs 24% in control area; GP attendances for abdominal symptoms +5.8%; urgent referrals +7.6% vs 0.05% in control. Evidence unchanged (single regional pilot; the 11-campaign synthesis remains the main source). Evaluation sources added 2026-10-22 (citation snowballing / helpline pass): Eberhardt 2022, Hughes-Hallett 2016, Siau 2017, Peacock 2013, Bethune 2013; evidence level and outcome unchanged.
Record cases/uk-be-clear-on-cancer.json, updated 2026-10-22· Link to this campaign